Legend Airy

--HIMYM*``
-






* pop culture
` sub prime/ or prime one
- OK, it's a stretch. 
Not to be Pol(lish)[!]


w.c. fields/m.c./e.b.:  words count/world coalition/water closet




9-11-14
[It is hard to get gung ho about a moderated~ response.  Although one side may want^ more, another may think it^ more of the same.  I will make a concerted effort to D-lineate (o'R lineate)?]


^ to reid aumf ~ to vote or not to vote / chew congress and run at the same time.

PIT Spot?

Meta-cystical point or so duh?


Not to pump the mess anger or dis-road improvements. 


i.e. change of(4) course


At this point, I will refrain from inserting links to confound or unfuse the above.
My O.I. is in the Lab3ls [!]


A.  NFRY
B.  Meta-slash
C.  Ribble
4.  P.C.




RSN: Smallest Font- Unread, Normal Font- Read, Small Font (or bold)- of special interest
Nicholas Kristof New York Times, Agence France-Presse,  David Remnick, The New Yorker, Jason Rosenbaum, National Public Radio, (...under construction)   Frank Rich, New York Magazine
TO: (...Under Construction)   .Yana Kunichoff, Truthout | Interview..


Spoiler alert?  The Last Word, Howard Dean ? IBT: wps 

Ouroboros

Dimentions
WSM
Consciousness is too cubed.

SE  3-21-2014
Happy SE [!]

44 ? 
dot Facetious D-wag
dot No Bell
dot Math is next
Period Harmony*
Light Speed
Trigger Alert*

* divergent 5 OW(no clue ! )

NQSNL

Not Quite [!]

3-12-14 [See labels**] or C-4-caricatures. -> [ Curve Balls?  /  / -/ * Legislation not politics! ]
*awk word seg way[!]
** unintended Mitt Flop ?

Ghost Busters

Every thing is PC. (Politically Conceptual) 

Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)


* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14

F'n anachronism:  i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.

 

[anachronistic construction of this post, the indicated youtube(*) was not fully viewed at insert]

Tan gents ? STOP!  These inserts are like judging a blog by my model. I have only viewed one of them.  Or in computer lingo GOTO line one.  Here I will jump to a missing link, not to practice*** quantum effects***. Dimensions are not dimentions without a perspective.  (Un-M-String from Slice of Pi^)**

[Planck's Length?]

 

** hit pause @ 0:13(4M theory?)

^ Cut the Cow Pie!

*** : Geometry of Purpose , Wittgenstein

 

2-27-14 [Are we?]

Pink Floyd

Post e. g.
Shades of Plato.
Knot too Cave. 
Lost ^ in Translation.

^ trans-something/not mogrify labelism
[The E Ron Crisis.]

From the bottomlineup!
tergiversate/Di-spencer with/the wall/social Darwinism.

BFT:(back from tangent^)
In the "corporations are people" and "government is bad" absolutist field, Kant we see that death to a country(read that the ideal of the name) is not death to a people(except if change is the enemy)^^.  The act of saying/wiping any name off the map, does not mean people die, unless people die.  Changing or wiping off a name is not an existential threat.  Anymore than American describes a people, or Zion is a race or state.  This can be seen in the poll(I speculate), that Iranians might hate America, but be more favorable to the people and other principles.  It might also be seen in the take on Israel from True Torah Jews.  But change is a threat to a part of us all.  Even the name Zion has geographical and metaphysical branches.(Castle/Dry Land/Brook)    

^^  context is everything and Mani-Hegelism; like might means maybe, and duality does not mean to exclude. 

(too the moon!)
[Supply and Demand Myth]  Supply more money and demand will increase.  Oops that was too Economic. Demand must come from the bottom up, that is how the money gets created.  Ironically or Mani-Hegelianistically answers don't come from above.  The slippery-slope or domino theory are about the set up and playing the game, not the slippery game and knocking it all down.

De-Natured Zone

Shades of the Neutral* Zone [!]

* Pun D M Z
Re-Natured: You can't go home again **.

** Re-Labelism

Pun it?

Somewhere* there is embedded a pecarious parsing**.  In actuality, and I don't mean "knot", but darn may be closer.  But that is a tan gent.

Rather than (FP!)*** I will list "some"(the above) links:
"Somewhere" / Game+Lock
"darn" / (b.s.) "we+weave"
"closer" / (b.s.) "delta+dawn"
"that" / Reading List (UC)
"tan gent" / Martin Bashir: Walsh & Alter

* not necessarily this link
** the parsing was an actual placement of the word "pun" in some link
*** (irony / not it)
[nor delta darn?]

A.  I have yet to locate the "pun" embedded in "some" link
B.  Earlier parsing or heading considered: Tool Shed.  Referencing pun on shedding (housing, dropping) To house, to drop. Well prior to The Cycle's "Fight or Flight."  "Panacea"? Pan a C-ya! (e.g. / i.e. ?)

Absolut(ist)ly...

in fair & balanced clothing.

Having actually read the first link twice, while it has useful comparisons that demonstrate the divide**, it holds an absolutist view that it is a win or lose for virtue as well as freedom. 

Speaking of a three-legged stool pidgin [!*] (...)
it is more about the balance and geometry. 
(not to mention Ctrl F)

* Sarcasm mark[!] & Mitt-Flop of Un-Reads under pidgin stool.
** : one leg Virtue v. two leg Freedom.
[The Emperor has 1/3 his trivium.]

[Final anachronism or*** Iron Knee ?]
*** Re:googleLabel. (i.e. a google of Secular Theo Libs and our regards.)
(FP0)
3-29-13 (FP1)

Third Times a Charm.

Not gonna go there.*

But here I will adjust the take on the reaction to Seth MacFarlane as host of the 2013 Academy Awards, which has provided an opportunity** to talk about what is Hume or Us!

*Bush III?
** I’ll tell you what’s funny :Was Seth MacFarlane's shtick really sexist? Yes, and also no — he fell afoul of the mysterious*** rules of comedy
*** Ctrl F "incongruity"

[Adjunct mess age ? ]

He said *a fowl*!

T-He He He He!

Lede[**] is pre-read of article.

P.S.* He said...she what? Ctrl F "incongruity"

*'n. P.R. (post-read) (O.W.)

[**] Editors note:(original saved in draft 3-2-13)
"Lede" replaces "Note", and to make a long G'Ribble short, my jest(or preemptive punchline) was Hume or Us? And to parse the pre-post-or-us, the asterisk was a play on my pre- & post- read of T-He article.  Original title: A Fowl[!]

Waking up to a New Year.

Americam Dreamer or Catsup Logging**.

Random Link Off My Desktop Top.*

*Not Exactly (it caught my eye)
** the order is now less lucid(or snoozing)

[speaking*** of two birds or mulberry rings.]
*** to be M-bedded or un
[p.s. you google so I don't have to (b.s. ), not to mention SCroll over, click or fun with labels]

Ribble?^ Marbles Clogs or American Exceptionalism.
(fn) Based on a Lucid Experiment (not really the source^^ but a punchline of sorts)
AC-DC?

^last insert
^^ but for "really","source" inserts

[Note parallel or geometric of some sort of sub-titles.  It might also be noted that I had only saved the *link, not listened to it that I recall.]

---   ---  BAM [!] --- ---
Hecuva derivative on two progressive New Year's reruns.  Ed & Thom!(and freedom of  association)

by Stiob?!?

D-google:
I reference this indirectly** in terms of how* I get here***.

*Ctrl F "ananchronist"
** ouch (practical stiob?)
*** "stiob"
(The "stiob" of practical*the link* is more a tan/gent shall.)
[Not to pun on more asterisks, but the dimentionalism might be.^]

^ [or (fn) IS! ]

[ submitted for yo/re consideration ?  / ! ... ]

[12-21-12: Project Salon Pause^^ ... Not !]
Also note that (fn) *link* was inserted on this date.
^^ (Ce ne pas, pax) Politics is something/everything paradox.(ouch)
(the last *^^* was paradox placement)
[Speaking of trilogies, trolls and toll-keens, my stumble upon "stiob" was via Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation (Or American Exceptionalism: Too Point Oh!)]
[A fellow tangent?(rise over run)]
[ SO ? ]

Fiddle Sticks^

by George ...

Lede or Ship Politcal** Gaming*.

(fn)
 Boehner tells Geithner, ‘You can’t be serious 
White House to GOP: It’s your move
“The Hobbit” is not a hipster!

(b.s.) "Lede+or+Ship"
Swift craft
Swift satire
M-bed ***

* by Jenga (enough! )
** un-M-bed
*** not to charm but what the?



[Anacronism of asterisks is a real problem between ** & ***, 
but it was through Slate*** under Osmosis** that I found the Doonesbury.]

[[That's the ticket! But this is a preemptive read. Support for raising taxes on the rich even runs over the barrier Republicans have constructed with their new minority of obstruction(4f), except for their "arithmetic" and Twain. Actually the link at TED did not cover the error that is made when comparing percentiles with shares, or per capita with any tiles and individuals with dollars.  Where4, there is more money in the top 1% therefore the top 1% are going to be paying a greater share of the taxes. Not to be competing with TED, but that means a progressive tax will look more unfair the more unfair income distribution is, unless you have a regressive tax.]]

(4f)= a, b, c, d ?   Crtl F and (b.s). for more moderate yet political approach.

^ last insert ? (See "^" there)  It is called leverage and political capital !
[Follow-up].

BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger"

I have a dearly departed Android.**
More on that Tan Gent later***.
Lede Or Ship [!]
Or Iron Knee Chef!

[Kant]
Now that's the ticket!*  Not[!]

*no SNL, but somewhere a Huntsman/ 3rd or 4th partisan Share 'n Angle.
**no, not a turkey(a 3G)
***  Curb your Journalism: Re-4mat'N.
(Ctrl-F 'n b.s. )

[FYI: "Blogger" is a dashboard for blogspotR's]

[Can?]



[Convenient Al Gore Rythms(square-bracket-eds) and Rubrics Cubed.]
...
[OW, not my We Ge! But DB(a) just in my inbox.]

a= exception to the Dash Bored[!] (link inserted later)
i.e. exception to the OW as in not just in, but recently ran across.
(original intent was "as")

[ Here we go again ! ...
buh dump ump  ^ (...)
Form^^ is not function, function is not purpose and everything else is gravy toss !]


^  re: sort (Norman Goldman is no dump but known for his employment of sound effects, and fits in this rim shot of radio hosts.  At least locally he fits on the air between Thom Hartmann and Randi Rhodes.)
^^ and the links here might need Platonic adjustment.

Pit Charts

Investment?
Revenues?
Spending?
Debt Charts?

Rob Johnsons?
Rob Johnsons!
Really.
Bowles Simpson.*
Rob Johnson.
(special thanks to Stephanie Miller and Jared Bernstein.)

*(huh?)(Speaking of M.B.eh?)

Double Down on Blue Print!
Double Down !
(Bumper Snicker ! )
[NOT!]

Speaking of charts.

The Daily Counter Balance

From The Dylan Ratigan Show:

The Daily Rant**: Today*

Speaking of headings or ledes or 4 ehs [!]

* to be linked here(Goodfriend Tribute to Snowe^)

[Speaking of preemptive embedding, Hardball on Romney speaking in pros, "looking for a KO"^?

Churning media or fulfilling the table, Killing Organizing, or Freedom of Foundation? Let alone "life among the cannibals.^" Not to mention AP-Paul-ING^ "Politics Nation". Do we want an Obama Nation or a Bane Nor Nation?*** Not to Pun on Lioness Pauling up Watson Creek.]

** actually this was on a panel (note anachronism of rant and panel)

*** Susan Del Percio^: Interesting Republican Spokes Person(2:42) in her opening talking points or not needing to defend Ryan but whine about the panel being 4 to 1 against her, before attacking the Senate or...

[3-21-12 ^ late links^^ added: Ryan Plan 2013]

^^ Like a Rolling Stone / Wired (Dylan not Belushi)

[The Glorious Revolution is embedded in the academics of "/","not""^^". Republicans want to revisit the mid-17th Century. See ^^ cycle. Sometimes to tergiversate is better than too sate-yore-deceive. (pun on give/take/receive) (Slash Not what you can do...)(If I may quibble withRobert Reich, and Noam Chomsky, I will have to link later^^^, but the former is related byword play to the latter by George. Society plays a part in defining words, so I guess I can't blame Chomsky for using words that we want to change. This relates to the evolution of the wordholocaust and the war on evolution. It relates to groups claiming words while we also want to define them under the flag of progress. Is abortion genocide? Is war murder? The law decides, while some forsake it, and the politics that decide it.)]

^^^ I must find a Chomsky use of the word murder in the context of war. (The connectingtissueis the use of "social Darwinism" in a way that is contrary to the survival of the fittest, that nails trickle-down to the cross. )

[update: Rober Reich ponders run ]

[on balance and more.]

Note that not only do Democrats spend less they generally contribute less to the national debt, at least since the late 70's. OK, so there are only two Democrats before Obama, but look what happened to Carter for being conservative, and at least in Clinton's case he bent the curve in two terms.

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

ROF, WOF

Ring of Fire

War on Freedom!

Rough Comments:

BBBB

Better Business Beyond Bull!

Or Bush!

Tale Gating !

[I may have forgotten the original excuse for the BB acronym. It was not the Buffet Bureau, and I am not sure** of (yet to find) the Ring of Fire links from this weekend(as I jotted down the above thoughts yesterday), which may have triggered the wag*on Freedom.]

* Republicans Repeal Beatitudes?

** sure: Occupy Movement

not: Mortgage Fraud Settlement (or vice verse us)

[Yes the wag is war on freedom. Woof? (on or?) War on/or freedom? Wag the Woof? Yes, Freedom is wagged as a word, but the effects are farther*** from freedom.]

*** It seems that Rick Santorum has raised nuance to a parsing of religious and economic freedom.

[NOW with Alex Wagner: Ari Melber sitting in on six months of OW.]

[Andrea Mitchell, Eva Longoria and American Progress .]

[Martin Bashir: Oil Fabrication, and Culture War.]

[Hard Ball,"Wow, it's getting too sophisticated." through 3-and-a-half men and Winning!]]

P.C.

In parsing convention or preemptive comment I will make the preemptive clause that it is better than preemptive conflict. Having said that, if it can be parsed civilly, I will pause constructively. Or rather, post concretely that I have yet to read these two that I feel may be in the balance of political craftiness.*

*Not only NFRY(not fully read yet) but link is only summary, I have a news stand copy to personally congest[!]

[!] a lazy pun on digest and play on PC or P. C.

(and or political con fusion NOT [!]**)

**

[more preemptive comment on parallel content]

Can you feel this working?

Or even follow this thinking?* Is George Lakoff practicing the same reinforcment and fine print? On the feeling front ? **

Does the market Lord over Republicans?
Does logic Lord over facts?
Is it really the slippery slope Lakoff sees?

The bold indicates the suggested read. Links are often footnotes or tangents(see [**] ), not primary sources that need a full read. I am commenting here on different results that reading this article may have on those from different parts of the political spectrum, and the impact of having read it on their perspective of their perspective.[*]
(You will have to read the Lakoff article, and then will you be prepared to answer the questions?) The focus on the metaphorical may have an underlying greater impact. The President is pounding on the pragmatics of values and that may be an over arching message.

*The Santorum Strategy by George Lakoff
** unembedded mixed front and other
*** (temp tech difficulties w/links: see footnotes)

Footnotes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ant_and_the_Grasshopper
Point: Metaphors evolve or are hijacked. (flip-flop over the centuries)
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=snob
Point: Pop Culture? Pontifical Santorum?
Concepts:
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Republican+table
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=divide+to+table
too http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=conquer

These last links found on Footnotes PAGE. (A, B, C)
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/p/footnotes.html

[*] last asterisk to note that these two "perspective" links are tangential[**] perspectives on perspectives.
[**] speaking of dump ties? (see *** ttdl See placement of link/asterisk inconvenience. )
[Related Breaking Toure on KONY 2012 (3-18-12 update)]
[Related Background: http://fora.tv/2007/06/28/Francis_Fukuyama_End_Of_History_Revisited ]
[And Martin Bashir: "but what am I?" Romney childishness.]
[Citizens United: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Citizens+United,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Strategy+of+right,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Koch+Brothers,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Roger+Ailes, purpose of these inconvenient (see *** & ttld) links, is to archive and find later reference to the divide further the table for their conversation. http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Koch+Table,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/karl-rove-vs-wa-hyperbole.html,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/politics-of-table.html, More Bashir: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Pee+Wee , http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Herman ,
Happy Birthday Romney http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2010/03/snooki.html, Infinity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOGWbzUM-y8 ]